The Sustainability Initiative at UNH
by Filson H. Glanz, Professor of EE (emeritus)
An initiative in Sustainability has started at UNH. There are many
definitions for Sustainability, but in a nutshell it means meeting the needs of
the present without limiting the possibility of future generations doing
likewise. Herman E. Daly, formerly a senior economist at the World Bank, and now
senior research scholar at the University of Maryland School of Public Affairs,
has expressed several laws of sustainability:
"Every renewable resource must be used at a rate less than or equal to
the rate at which it is being regenerated.Every nonrenewable resource must be
used at a rate less than or equal to the rate at which a renewable substitute
can be developed.Our waste stream must be emitted into the environment at a rate
less that or equal to that at which the earth can absorb, assimilate, or make
harmless."
It seems obvious that these "laws" should be obeyed, even though
few individuals and almost no industries follow them today! The idea of
sustainability has been around for many years, but recently it has become more
widespread due to several international movements.
But why is there interest in sustainability? The main reason has to
do with the projection of diminishing resources (and increased pollution) in the
light of increasing demand due to growth in population and standard of living,
especially in developing countries. For example, three separate projections show
that oil reserves will run out at current usage in about 2050 to 2075. Of course
new oil reserves are found each year (thereby postponing the crisis date), and
some countries will probably try to increase their standard of living and demand
much more oil than they currently do (e.g. China with about 1.2 billion
people),thus accelerating the ominous drastic rise in oil prices.
Other resources that are or will be strained in the near future
are air, water, soil, land for building/recreation/wilderness, certain minerals,
forests, upper atmospheric ozone, etc. Forest is disappearing fast enough to be
a concern with regard to increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Global
warming is a real threat, so much so that the Group Chief Executive of British
Petroleum America, John Browne, announced that his company thinks that world
governments should act now to curb global warming. John’s company plans a new
generation of solar cells that is more efficient and less expensive. To quote
him:
"There is a lot of noise in the data. It is hard to isolate cause
and effect. But there is now an effective consensus among the world’s leading
scientists and serious and well-informed people outside the scientific community
that there is a discernible human influence on the climate, and a link between
the concentration of carbon dioxide and the increase in temperature. The time
to consider the policy dimensions of climate change is not when the link between
greenhouse gases and climate change is conclusively proven, but when the
possibility cannot be discounted and is taken seriously by the society of which
we are a part. We also want to transfer our distinctive technologies into
production, to increase manufacturing capacity and to position the business to
reach one billion dollars in sales over the next decade. The result of all this
is that gradually, but progressively, solar will make a contribution to the
resolution of the problem of carbon dioxide emissions and climate change."
Human behavior is such that we tend to deny a problem that will
make itself felt more that ten years into the future. But many environmental and
resource problems, although solvable, will require decades to solve. Examples of
human societies that have collapsed due to lack of foresight are numerous and
well documented in the history literature. Some examples:
The archaeological story of Easter Island (e.g. Discover,
August ‘95) clearly shows the result of not living sustainably. Settlers about
400 AD found a lush forested paradise. The population grew to maybe 20,000 but
because sustainability was not the way of life, resources dwindled and clan
wars, starvation, cannibalism, and population crash resulted. A few thousand
individuals and barren grassland were found when the island was rediscovered on
Easter Day of 1722. The message is clear for Earth Island! Archaeologists have
found Greek valleys, which had communities that developed, died off, and
redeveloped over a 500 to 1000 year cycle because they over-utilized the
available resources. Five or six such cycles have been documented. Indians in
the South West, the Mayan civilization, etc. History repeats itself!
So, then, what is the nature of the UNH Sustainability Initiative?
First, it is University-wide. There are interested and active people in all
college faculties, in the student populations - both undergraduate and graduate,
and in the staff. The numbers are not large in absolute terms nor in percentage,
but they are growing. About 100 people came to one of the Saturday
Sustainability Stakeholders meetings. All disciplines can contribute and should
be involved. There is a need for people to look into the psychological reasons
why humans deny the distant future, how people will be affected by living
sustainably, etc. Arts, communications, economics, engineering, physics, health
studies, biology, management, literature, history, philosophy, etc. can all
solve some of the problems and make contributions. And, of course, education
about sustainability can be taught by all disciplines.
Another aspect of the sustainability movement is the development of
a sense of community. Everyone involved in everyday life is conscious of the
isolation of people from other people (not physically but psychologically or
spiritually), and of the inability to find time for family and community
interactions in a quality way. Sustaining the spirit/psyche seems to be one very
important aspect of the movement! As with anything that looks like a movement,
not everyone who believes in sustainability agrees with all aspects or
approaches suggested by any group or individual. Furthermore, there are many
people who do not recognize, believe, or otherwise buy into the ideas of
sustainability - especially because of the ambiguity of the term. But there is
room for many points of view as long as we have a net motion toward solving the
problems we face for the long run. Some believe that only more technology and
marketing can solve our problems; some believe that more chemicals, high tech
solutions, more investment, more capital, more wealth, etc. can move us in the
right direction. Still, as a grass roots idea, flexibility, open mindedness, and
diversity of approach are needed for success.
What are some details of the Initiative? A significant
endowment has been established for sustainability education. There is available
well over $200,000 annually for projects and personnel having to do with
sustainability education. This past spring there was an international search for
a Director of Sustainability to help lead the Initiative. Dr. Tom Kelly,
formerly from Tufts University, was selected from a group of more than fifty
impressive candidates.
There has been very great interest expressed by the staff of the
University in this initiative - probably the highest percentage of interest
among the various groups around campus! Who best knows the waste of materials
and energy that goes on at UNH due to lack of interest or awareness? Staff are
well represented on the committee that has drawn up a white paper to set goals
for making the everyday operation of UNH more sustainable. That paper has been
presented to the President of UNH and has been distributed around campus. There
was even a course this spring taught by a member of the Natural Resources
Department and the head of UNH Purchasing on purchasing policy. A number of
large volume products were chosen for research into which products are most
sustainable. These include both consumables and durable products.
Will industry respond to this idea? Many industries in the US
have already responded to the sustainability idea for a combination of reasons
including the principle, the profit, and the limited availability of resources
(including places to dump wastes: air, water, landfills). As an example, the CEO
of an international carpet manufacturer started a process of introspection and
investigation that led to the sustainable practice of leasing carpeting so that
used carpet is turned in to be remade into new carpet. A number of carpet firms
now follow this practice, saving untold landfill volume and oil resources needed
for the synthetic fiber.
Of course, less energy use means savings in electric generation
infrastructure and land. Reduction in electric power usage is one of the easy
ways to save. It has been projected that the US could easily save 25 to 50
percent of the electric power we now use at a cost that would not lower our
standard of living nor require completely new capital equipment and
structures.
How can engineering contribute to this effort? Because of
research, experimentation, and development on solar energy and energy efficiency
in the late 1970s and early 1980s, the energy demands of commercial buildings
and homes went down enough to save a considerable number of barrels of imported
oil each day. But then oil prices went down and people did not care about the
energy savings, so the US did some backsliding in terms of continued savings.
However, many of the buildings that were built then are still saving energy now.
Projections show that much more imported oil could be saved, thus reducing trade
imbalances and extending the time until oil prices go up drastically. There is
still plenty of research and development left to be done to achieve more
efficient use of fossil fuels, and engineering is one key component necessary to
reach better efficiencies.
But there are many other ways we can engineer a more sustainable,
economical future. Transportation is another energy/space consumer that has a
long way to go to be as efficient as it can be. There is much wasted energy to
gain back. For example, cars can be made much more efficient with the added
advantage that polluting emissions will also be reduced. Our current autos are
only a few percent efficient! Amory Lovins, who founded the Rocky Mountain
Institute in Colorado, is working with a number of manufacturers on what he call
the Hypercar. This car would be lightweight, store braking energy rather than
converting it to heat, be designed for maximum passenger safety, and get from
100 to 400 miles per gallon. The first models should come out in a few
years.
Other transportation projects that would save energy, space, pollution
etc. have to do with rapid transit systems. High-speed magnetically levitated
monorails have been in the demonstration stage for years, but the economical
development of the infrastructure is yet to be accomplished. The American people
must want and be willing to use rapid transit for it to come about!
Another area where engineering and science can contribute to a
different way of life is photovoltaic (PV) electric power generation. Increases
in efficiency and reductions in cost have been progressing over the last 15
years. Roofing that has integrated PV cells and looks like regular roofing is
now available for homes. When the price comes down to be competitive with other
forms of electric generation, a major change in our power systems will come
about. The power system would become distributed with transmission lines used as
a way of making the system more reliable and providing storage. Of course
methods of storage other than lead acid batteries would have to be developed:
flywheels, compressed gas, pumped hydro, electrolysis and storage of hydrogen,
and other methods are being considered. Also there is a study that indicates
that solar cell production has the highest rate of injury among all the energy
sources (due to injury in mining the large volume of materials needed). As you
can see, there is still much engineering to do!
A few engineering schools are researching and teaching sustainable
design. Georgia Tech University has a Center for Sustainable Design
(http://howe.ce.gatech.edu/Centers/CST/cst.html) which tries to orient design
for recycling and reuse of parts among other things. Even GM is developing a
fully recyclable car.
One project going on now in the ECE Department is the master’s thesis
work of graduate student Garry Brown. Garry is working on a model of the
electrical and thermal behavior of potentially sustainable living-learning
facilities. The modeling program STELLA is being used for this project because
of its ease of use and because it is one of the important systems modeling tools
used widely. The model will include the possibility of various types of energy
sources and usage such as solar energy, bioenergy, hydrogeneration, biogas
(methane), fuel cell generation, etc. Furthermore, the model will be easily
expanded to include other aspects of a sustainable facility such as food
production, waste handling, and water usage.
The possibilities for engineering projects in sustainability are
limitless. As more engineering departments accept the necessity of living
sustainably, more ideas will emerge and more engineers will be trained to
consider the sustainable aspects of their designs. Industry will recognize and
eventually demand that engineers they hire be conscious of sustainability issues
and be trained to design with sustainability in mind.
There is much at stake, and there is much that engineers can do to
improve the chances of survival on earth of all forms of life, of the natural
environment, and of the form of society that we all cherish.